Makes sense to me, would we extend it to the other cases where we use the parenthesis syntax as well (eventually)?
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Wail Alkowaileet <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Nov 27, 2017 19:24, "abdullah alamoudi" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear devs, >> We would like to get your input on changing the syntax of the merge policy >> definition. >> >> Current syntax: >> <USING> <COMPACTION> <POLICY> prefix_merge (("number"="123"),("size"=" >> 456")); >> >> Proposed syntax >> <WITH> {"compaction policy": {"name": "prefix_merge", "parameters": >> {"number": 123,"size": 456}}}; >> >> Advantages: >> 1. Compaction and policy are not key words anymore. >> 2. Use a JSON for key value pairs instead of a strange syntax. >> >> Thoughts?
