I didn't see the tweet that way. The current difficulty (users installing non-production trial config and using it inappropriately) is better than the converse (users not installing production config because it is onerous to do and never using the software at all).
Whether you make trial easier (and run the risk of inappropriate use) or make defaults much more realistic for production use (and run the risk of killing adoption) is a really hard question. In my $dayjob, we opt for the second, but pay a stiff price. I think open source projects do much better opting for adoption as Asterix has done. On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 1:02 PM Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: > (Wow, rereading this, it sounds a bit too much like the tone of a Trump > tweet... Ugh. :-)) > > On 12/16/18 12:57 PM, Michael J. Carey wrote: > > Naive users are routinely ending up with multiple node demo clusters and > > not realizing what they are doing or getting. Then they performance test > > and judge the system accordingly. Not beneficial! > > >
