+1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 12:23 PM Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > (Interesting times we live in... :-)) > > On 2/17/26 11:37 AM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > Hi fellow devs, > > I think the discussion back in December > > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/wyt1kjr8j1s0x58hhc2cd6lprh2lrzdo) > > converged and it's time for a vote. The proposal is as follows: > > > > When the content of a commit contains substantial portions that are > > derived from the output of an LLM or similar tool, a field > > 'Generated-by: ", shall be added to the footer of the commit that > > lists the tool(s) used to obtain the commit's contents. Committers > > shall also ensure that content generated in this way compiles with the > > ASF's Generative Tooling Guidance > > (https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html), with > > particular attention paid to the license provided for the output of > > the tool, and whether or not it is clearly reproducing code that is > > already licensed. Furthermore, if a commit contains a mixture of > > generated and written code, it is greatly encouraged to use a comment > > containing "//Generated: " or the Java @Generated annotation to denote > > portions of code that are substantially the output of an LLM. > > > > The vote is open for 72 hours, or until the necessary number of votes > > (3 +1) has been reached. > > > > Please vote > > [ ] +1 accept this proposal for all new commits going forward > > [ ] 0 No strong feeling either way > > [ ] -1 do not accept this proposal because ... > > > > Thanks, > > - Ian
