I've gone ahead and fixed the last really nasty bug I know of with it related to the query viewer. I think if everyone else hasn't found any severe regressions, I think it's time to get a review and merge the change.
On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 11:21 PM Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have tested it - seems as functional as the old 19006 interface - I > ran through my usual starting paces (based on the Don Chamberlin data > that we use for things, including tabular views) and it worked fine! > > Now we need an extension for multi-statement results...! :-) (Which > this version of the interface never had, results-handling-wise.) > > More generally we should find a way to enhance this interface with the > things (like the above) that we like better in the old 19001 interface > and then deprecate that one, perhaps? > > Cheers, > > Mike > > PS - And we need the upcoming NL2SQL++ assistant on the side... :-) > > On 4/28/26 5:58 PM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > Hello fellow devs, > > As some of you might already know, I've been trying to update the > > dependencies and build for the UI (also called the dashboard) for a > > while now off and on. The reason for this is it would be really nice > > to have for the next release. Shipping a 6+ year old version of > > Angular doesn't feel like a good idea. > > I have a patch now that migrates it to Angular 21 and switches the > > build to use bun instead of npm. I think I've gotten it to a point > > where it's fairly functional. > > Given that, I would appreciate it if some folks would try it out and > > look for bugs I didn't see or that don't happen for me. The main quirk > > I have noticed is in the plan viewer, if you switch to detailed view, > > the plan will look messed up until you zoom to fit. I fixed most of > > the other things I noticed. > > The patch is here:https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/c/asterixdb/+/21081 > > And I made a binary folks can use to try it here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-server-0.9.10-dashboard-preview.tar.bz2 > > > > Thanks! > > -Ian
