Hi, coming back to this. I think that it would be the “right” choice to have 2 repositories here. However, a) I’m not sure if “1 repository per project" is an unchangeable rules and b) if other people think differently about this.
What are your thoughts/opinions on this? Thanks, Till > On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:56 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > So far they were released separately as other projects depend on Hyracks as > well (Apache VXQuery, Pregelix (not Apache)). We actually briefly considered > to propose both projects separately, but since they are developed by the same > community and we’ve heard “community over code” more than once, it seemed > more appropriate to have 1 project for 1 community. > What that the “right” choice or would we have gotten different advice if we > had discussed this before starting incubation? > > Thanks, > Till > >> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My thinking was just to have to directories under main git repo for >> asterixdb and hyracks. The README.md then describe what each directory >> contains. >> >> The drawback is that those 2 modules now work as one for both releases >> and branches, which I think makes sense from project perspective. >> >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Henry, >>> >>> not sure, never tried to work like this with git :) >>> Do you know by any chance if it is possible to create branches for >>> sub-modules (not need to google for, I can do that if you haven't tried >>> either). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Till >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> HI Till, >>>> >>>> I believe usually one ASF project will get one source repo. >>>> Would it be easier to have 2 sub-modules of asterixdb and hyracks? >>>> >>>> - Henry >>>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Chris, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> I’ve got a few questions: >>>>> >>>>> 1) Should we import the code already before we are clear on the SGA? >>>>> 2) Currently we actually have 2 repositories, one for AsterixDB and one >>>>> for Hyracks. And since we have other projects that depend on Hyracks that >>>>> actually makes some sense. Would it be possible to have 2 repositories >>>>> here as well? (Sorry, I should have come up with that question earlier …). >>>>> 3) Does anybody know if there’s an easy (automated) way to migrate issues >>>>> from Google Code to the Apache JIRA. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Till >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 15, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> Our Git repo is now up thanks to INFRA: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9212 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yay! >>>>>> >>>>>> I know we are working on the SGA, but if folks want to use >>>>>> it, please feel free. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also our JIRA instance is also up: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9213 >>>>>> >>>>>> It’s accessible at: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Chris >>>>>> >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>>>>> Chief Architect >>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) >>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 >>>>>> Email: [email protected] >>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department >>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >
