Will the documentation be included in the site or will the documentation be an external link?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, no it isn't supposed to link to the stable version. The value in > _config.yml was wrong. Fixed! > > - Ian > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Ildar Absalyamov < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > The link to the 0.8.7-snapshot on > > https://parshimers.github.io/asterix-website/download.html < > > https://parshimers.github.io/asterix-website/download.html> leeds to > > latest released version. > > Is that supposed to be that way? > > > > > On Jun 4, 2015, at 20:01, Eugenia Gabrielova < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > > > I like the website, it's very informative! > > > > > > My only suggestion might be to add a bit of color contrast in and > between > > > some of the sections: Feature Overview and Getting Started sections, > and > > on > > > the Download page. I felt like the content of these sections and the > > > download page was harder for me to visually follow because the columns > > > bleed together a bit. > > > > > > As an example of how it might be adjusted: http://jekyllrb.com/, on > the > > > Jekyll website, you can see how the red bar in the middle splits the > page > > > between features, installation instructions, and hosting information. > The > > > feature columns on this site are narrow, which makes each paragraph a > bit > > > easier to follow. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Eugenia > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Hey everyone, > > >> > > >> I've been working on making a better website to use for our Apache > > domain. > > >> You can check out a preview here : > > >> *https://parshimers.github.io/asterix-website/ > > >> <https://parshimers.github.io/asterix-website/>* , and the source is > > here > > >> : > > >> https://github.com/parshimers/asterix-website . It should build like > > any > > >> other Jekyll website, just be sure to change the URL if you try > > previewing > > >> it locally. > > >> > > >> Any thoughts would be welcomed. I think the frontpage still needs some > > work > > >> (the features should have some sort of small image to illustrate each > > one > > >> ), and there should be a detailed features page. The documentation > also > > >> needs to be harmonized and integrated with this site. I think we could > > also > > >> add a blog easily, but I'm not sure how everyone feels about that. It > > would > > >> be good to show activity and give people a peek of what's going on > > between > > >> releases. > > >> > > >> This new website should also be a lot easier to maintain and add > > content to > > >> for everyone. There's really not much HTML required unless it is a > more > > >> complex layout like the front page, for example all of the > contribution > > >> pages are just markdown. > > >> > > >> Thanks, and looking forward to your comments, > > >> - Ian > > >> > > > > Best regards, > > Ildar > > > > >
