Replies inline:
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 16:28, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The locally produced Datatype object is actually never totally valid though
> from the way I am seeing things. So there is no reason to cache it in the
> first place.
>
Indeed. But bypassing a cache is valid in this particular case only.
>
> I talked with Mike about this today. I think the main points were as
> follows (correct me if I am wrong of course!):
>
> - Is it possible to move the name generation in DatatypeTupleTranslator
> into TypeTranslator.computeTypes? This would let the client have the fully
> updated object and avoid updating anything at the MD node side.
I was thinking about this as well. Don’t quite see why that would not be
possible.
>
> - The entire type name generation seems weird. Why is it that we need those
> names in the first place? For example take this type:
>
>
> create type FacebookMessageType as closed {
> message-id: int32,
> author-id: int32,
> in-response-to: int32?,
> sender-location: point?,
> message: string
> }
>
> and the Metadata entry for that type:
>
> { "DataverseName": "TinySocial",
> "DatatypeName": "FacebookMessageType",
> "Derived": { "Tag": "RECORD",
> "IsAnonymous": false,
> "EnumValues": null,
> "Record": { "IsOpen": false,
> "Fields": [ { "FieldName":
> "message-id", "FieldType": "int32" },
> { "FieldName":
> "author-id", "FieldType": "int32" },
> { "FieldName":
> "in-response-to",
> "FieldType":
> "Field_in-response-to_in_FacebookMessageType"
> },
> { "FieldName":
> "sender-location",
> "FieldType":
> "Field_sender-location_in_FacebookMessageType"
> },
> { "FieldName":
> "message", "FieldType": "string" }
> ]
> },
> "Union": null,
> "UnorderedList": null,
> "OrderedList": null
> },
> "Timestamp": "Thu Jun 11 11:35:33 PDT 2015"
> }
>
> Wouldn't it be better if we could make the Field entries for the nullable
> fields not dependent on this weird anonymous UNION(something,null) type?
> Something more like
>
> { "FieldName": "in-response-to", "FieldType":"point", "Optional":true}
Yeah, this whole naming thing might look weird, especially when it is applied
to nullable fields, which are in essence a primitive type.
But for whatever reason we have chosen implementing a nullable fields as a a
complex data type: union with null field. At the same time generating names for
complex types is legitimate, and even required in case of anonymous nested
types, e.g:
create type FacebookMessageType as closed {
message-id: int32,
author-id: int32,
in-response-to: int32?,
sender-location: {
coordinate:point,
POI: string
}?,
message: string
}
>
> We should definitely discuss this more on Friday
>
> - Ian
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Ildar Absalyamov <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Just a bit of background, the bug is not specific to RTree, but will be
>> triggered on any index, created on a nullable field.
>> In order to persist datatype with a nullable field a special internal type
>> with name ’Type_xxx_UnionType_yyy’ must be created on MD node side.
>> However the stale version of datatype (where the name of the nullable
>> field is not yet computed) is returned on the client, where it got cached.
>>
>> Clearly, relying on the fact that the argument supposedly passed by
>> reference will get updated is wrong, when things are sent via RMI (and
>> Ian’s patch resolves that).
>> However I think a better way would be to invalidate locally cached stale
>> copy, so when the actual index is created it will query the MD and get the
>> right Datatype.
>> That is in line with the question Niki (our visiting student from Germany)
>> asked me today, for which I did not had a clear answer: how do we manage
>> the local MD cache and invalidate it?
>>
>>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 02:43, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Indeed, it is weird practice at best. The real index is an RTree index on
>>> FacebookMessages.sender-location, which is nullable, and the code path to
>>> create that index just happens to trigger this.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This sounds like a bad practice (doing any mods on the MD node - we
>> should
>>>> view the call as passing in immutable data).
>>>> But I'm not sure which index is being referred to here - what index on
>>>> what dataset is the "actual index" below?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/9/15 5:11 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So I think I might have a fix for this:
>>>>> https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/283/1
>>>>>
>>>>> This bug is really insidious. What I think is happening is that in
>>>>> AqlTranslator, the types are computed and given to the MetadataManager
>> as
>>>>> a
>>>>> new Datatype, to insert into the metadata node via RMI on MetadataNode.
>>>>> However MetadataNode modifies the object it is given before it inserts
>> it
>>>>> into the actual index. That is where the names of the nullable types
>> get
>>>>> generated, and so the MetadataManager doesn't get to see those changes
>>>>> unless MetadataManager and MetadataNode are actually sharing the same
>>>>> object. So if it is stale, that object gets inserted into the cache,
>> and
>>>>> when the index is created, it sees the stale type information rather
>> than
>>>>> the true value that's stored in the index.
>>>>>
>>>>> My fix is just to read it again before inserting into the cache. I'm
>> not
>>>>> really sure thats the right thing to do though. And if there are any
>> other
>>>>> instances of this type (caller expecting changes on remote side to
>>>>> reflect), the same sort of behavior can happen.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Ian
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> My quack theory is that it is due to the RMI somehow, or that the RMI
>>>>>> reveals it. It isn't specific to managix. It happens as long as the CC
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> NC reside in different JVMs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Ian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Ildar Absalyamov <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As Ian mentioned test case already exists (which I thought was good
>>>>>>> enough to prevent regressions like this one), but for some reason
>> it’s
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> triggering the error, whereas if the same ddl\query is executed on a
>>>>>>> local
>>>>>>> cluster, which was prepared by managix, the error will trigger.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 08:07, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ildar, can you try to nail this one down and also add a test case if
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> can create one once this is making more sense...?
>>>>>>>> On Jun 8, 2015 11:58 PM, "Ildar Absalyamov" <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Interesting, I guess step 1 here would be to investigate what’s
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in test framework\AsterixHyracksIntegrationUntil setup and regular
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cluster
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> configuration, created by managix.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 23:37, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I was playing around with the latest snapshot version, trying to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> create a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> fresher version of my demo docker container, and so I ran through
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> ADM/AQL 101. However I couldn't get it to work, which was really
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> surprising
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (and distressing). The error appears after trying to create an
>> RTree
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> index
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> sender-location:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SEVERE: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.metadata.MetadataException:
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.metadata.MetadataNode.addIndex(MetadataNode.java:229)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:323)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:197)
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:196)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:568)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(TCPTransport.java:826)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.lambda$run$97(TCPTransport.java:683)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler$$Lambda$2/1502895914.run(Unknown
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Source)
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:682)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:276)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java:253)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:162)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invokeRemoteMethod(RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.java:194)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.java:148)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy11.addIndex(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.metadata.MetadataManager.addIndex(MetadataManager.java:417)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.aql.translator.AqlTranslator.handleCreateIndexStatement(AqlTranslator.java:920)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.aql.translator.AqlTranslator.compileAndExecute(AqlTranslator.java:261)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.api.http.servlet.APIServlet.doPost(APIServlet.java:97)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:754)
>>>>>>>>>>> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:847)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:546)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:483)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:231)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:970)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:411)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:192)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:904)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:117)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:110)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:347)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:439)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.content(HttpConnection.java:924)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:781)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:220)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.AsyncHttpConnection.handle(AsyncHttpConnection.java:43)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.handle(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:545)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint$1.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:43)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:529)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.io.DataOutputStream.writeUTF(DataOutputStream.java:347)
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.io.DataOutputStream.writeUTF(DataOutputStream.java:323)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.hyracks.dataflow.common.data.marshalling.UTF8StringSerializerDeserializer.serialize(UTF8StringSerializerDeserializer.java:44)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.dataflow.data.nontagged.serde.AStringSerializerDeserializer.serialize(AStringSerializerDeserializer.java:47)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.dataflow.data.nontagged.serde.AStringSerializerDeserializer.serialize(AStringSerializerDeserializer.java:26)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.formats.nontagged.AqlSerializerDeserializerProvider$1.serialize(AqlSerializerDeserializerProvider.java:208)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.formats.nontagged.AqlSerializerDeserializerProvider$1.serialize(AqlSerializerDeserializerProvider.java:189)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.metadata.entitytupletranslators.IndexTupleTranslator.getTupleFromMetadataEntity(IndexTupleTranslator.java:260)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> edu.uci.ics.asterix.metadata.MetadataNode.addIndex(MetadataNode.java:224)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:323)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:197)
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:196)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:568)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(TCPTransport.java:826)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.lambda$run$97(TCPTransport.java:683)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler$$Lambda$2/1502895914.run(Unknown
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Source)
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:682)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ... 1 more
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I started going back, trying this on older and older revisions
>> until
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> stopped happening. It looks like this somehow has been lurking in
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> Open/nested indexing code for a long time. The error does not
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> reproduce
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the testing framework, for some reason I don't understand.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The source of the bug seems to be that the RTree index is on a
>> type
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> UNION(sender-location, null). The name of the type is not set
>> like it
>>>>>>>>>> should be, it is null. Then in IndexTupleTranslator, the 9th
>> field of
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> new metadata record is written with the name of the type- which is
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> null,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> everything explodes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What is especially puzzling- is that this doesn't reproduce in
>>>>>>>>>> AsterixHyracksIntegrationUtil. There, the name of the type is
>>>>>>>>>> "Field_sender-location_in_FacebookMessageType". This type is
>> created
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the deployed version, however it doesn't seem to be picked up.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will keep digging on this, but I imagine someone more familiar
>> with
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Open/Nested indexing patch might have an idea about why this is
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> happening.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To reproduce just try deploying the snapshot version from the
>> website
>>>>>>>>>> normally on your machine, and run through ADM/AQL 101.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Ian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Ildar
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Ildar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Ildar
>>
>>
Best regards,
Ildar
