Thanks for the comments guys. :) There's now an external link icon for the documentation page, and on the dev setup it references Github instead of google code. There's still a few more instances of google code resources lurking but none that are user-visible...
- Ian On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Murtadha Hubail <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks good. > > Just a note regarding the development setup page, it's still referencing > google code repo. > > -Murtadha > >> On Jun 15, 2015, at 10:12 PM, Eugenia Gabrielova >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Looks great! >> >> Nitpick: Since the "Documentation" link takes you to a page on another >> domain, might be nice to add an external link icon to it: >> http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icon/external-link/ >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 -- looks very nice to me! >>> >>> >>> On 6/15/15 1:40 PM, Ian Maxon wrote: >>> >>>> I've tried to incorporate some of the changes mentioned in the thread, >>>> an updated version of the site is here (at the same place!) : >>>> https://parshimers.github.io/asterix-website/index.html >>>> >>>> If there are no major objections I think this will get pushed to the >>>> Apache website once we release in the next week or so. >>>> >>>> - Ian >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I've been working on making a better website to use for our Apache >>>>> domain. >>>>> You can check out a preview here : >>>>> https://parshimers.github.io/asterix-website/ , and the source is here : >>>>> https://github.com/parshimers/asterix-website . It should build like any >>>>> other Jekyll website, just be sure to change the URL if you try >>>>> previewing >>>>> it locally. >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts would be welcomed. I think the frontpage still needs some >>>>> work >>>>> (the features should have some sort of small image to illustrate each >>>>> one ), >>>>> and there should be a detailed features page. The documentation also >>>>> needs >>>>> to be harmonized and integrated with this site. I think we could also >>>>> add a >>>>> blog easily, but I'm not sure how everyone feels about that. It would be >>>>> good to show activity and give people a peek of what's going on between >>>>> releases. >>>>> >>>>> This new website should also be a lot easier to maintain and add content >>>>> to >>>>> for everyone. There's really not much HTML required unless it is a more >>>>> complex layout like the front page, for example all of the contribution >>>>> pages are just markdown. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, and looking forward to your comments, >>>>> - Ian >>>>> >>>> >>> >
