Thanks a lot, Ted!! Best, Yingyi
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here is a handy reference: > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a > > MIT licenses are fine as dependencies. The basic principle is that > dependencies that don't force any special restrictions on how users license > software that includes Apache code are fine. Thus, public domain, Apache > license, MIT and BSD are all completely fine. At most, these require > acknowledgement. > > Where there is a problem is with share-alike or GPL since these kinds of > dependencies Apache to change their license and force downstream users into > particular licensing models. Regardless of whether that is a universal > good or not, it isn't what Apache does. > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Yingyi Bu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I previously added the maven test dependency MockIto (a simple and amazing >> mock unit test library) in my local branch. But I just realized it is >> under MIT license: https://github.com/mockito/mockito/blob/master/LICENSE >> >> Does anyone know if that's OK or not? >> It looks another Apache project does have MIT licensed dependency: >> http://curator.apache.org/dependencies.html >> Thanks! >> >> Best, >> Yingyi >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asterixdb-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >
