+1. Our tests need a lot of work, so putting new features on the back burner will definitely help with getting that work done.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:43 AM, abdullah alamoudi <[email protected]> wrote: > ++1 > > Amoudi, Abdullah. > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Yingyi Bu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1! >> >> Best, >> Yingyi >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > there are a number of discussions (on and off list) and other indicators >> > (people on the users list not getting ahead) that we have a relatively >> big >> > number of issues that affect both the usability (and adoption) of the >> > system and the productivity of development. >> > >> > I think that it would be good to move into a stabilization phase for a >> > while. In such a phase we would focus on addressing known issues and only >> > add new features to master is there is broad agreement (on this list) >> that >> > the feature is an exception. The goal of the phase would be to address >> all >> > issues of priority “Major” and above (with the option of agreeing on >> > de-prioritizing issues …) and to increase test coverage. >> > >> > Thoughts? Concerns? Questions? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Till >> > >> > P.S. I think that the 0.8.8 release should not be affected by entering >> > such a phase. >> > >>
