@Taewoo: Could we merge that into master so that we don’t get
conflicts later on?
Cheers,
Till
On 25 Jan 2016, at 10:28, Taewoo Kim wrote:
@Yingyi: I have created left-outer-unnestmap-operator in my index-only
branch for index-left-outer-join.
Best,
Taewoo
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Yingyi Bu <[email protected]>
wrote:
UnnestMap should stay there, but it shouldn't be used for
index-left-outer-join.
For index-left-outer-join, we need an OuterUnnestMapOperator to have
the
outer unnest semantics.
Best,
Yingyi
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Abdullah Alamoudi (JIRA) <
[email protected]> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15114810#comment-15114810
]
Abdullah Alamoudi commented on ASTERIXDB-1276:
----------------------------------------------
I don't think that I am the best one to answer this :)
Maybe Yingyi can chime in.
Remove UnnestMapOperator
------------------------
Key: ASTERIXDB-1276
URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1276
Project: Apache AsterixDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Operators
Reporter: Abdullah Alamoudi
Priority: Minor
UnnestMap operator is used temporarily until index operators are
added
to Algebricks
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
