Cool. Thanks for doing this. You saved me a lot of digging :) On Apr 5, 2016 6:28 AM, "Till Westmann" <ti...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sounds good. Thanks for looking into this, Murtadha! > > Cheers, > Till > > > On Apr 4, 2016, at 18:06, Murtadha Al-Hubail <hubail...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I had a look at it. It is caused by a deadlock when a temporary dataset > > triggers a flush. > > It wasn’t detected when I introduced a change that eliminates FLUSH logs > > generation for temporary indexes because recovery test cases were broken. > > > > I submitted a fix for it [1] and added a runtime test case. The build > > should succeed after it gets merged. > > > > Cheers, > > Murtadha > > > > [1] https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/785/ > > > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> since the last successful test run that took 55 mins [1] we seem to have > >> more than doubled the runtime to time out at 2 hours [2]. > >> Does anybody have an idea what caused this? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Till > >> > >> [1] > https://asterix-jenkins.ics.uci.edu/job/asterix-integration-tests/124/ > >> [2] > https://asterix-jenkins.ics.uci.edu/job/asterix-integration-tests/130/ > >> > >
