Thanks to Mike Blow, we now have reports of our test coverage for the code base. Testing is essential in controlling code quality and our current coverage could use serious improvement.
Now that we have the tools to get coverage information, I suggest we establish a minimum required test coverage for all changes. We can start by enforcing this on new classes while not reducing the coverage for existing classes. I suggest we set the minimum coverage to 80%. What is nice about this is that this is an objective measure and no one can claim he's being treated unfairly. Code that is not tested is a broken code. Thoughts?
