> On Sept. 1, 2017, 8:18 p.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> > intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/AtlasErrorCode.java
> > Lines 99 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61526/diff/3/?file=1810640#file1810640line99>
> >
> >     I think we should treat classification's empty entity-type to mean 
> > 'apply whatever restrictons placed on super-types'.

agreed


> On Sept. 1, 2017, 8:18 p.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> > intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/AtlasErrorCode.java
> > Lines 116 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61526/diff/3/?file=1810640#file1810640line116>
> >
> >     Consider replacing the message with the following:
> >       "Entity (guid=‘{0}‘,typename=‘{1}‘) cannot be classified as ‘{2}‘, 
> > because of the restrictions specified in the classification"

I changed the msg text slightly but basically took this change.


> On Sept. 1, 2017, 8:18 p.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> > intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/type/AtlasClassificationType.java
> > Lines 114 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61526/diff/3/?file=1810642#file1810642line114>
> >
> >     Here we should find intersection of entity-types specified in all 
> > super-types. Using union of entity-types restrictions in super-types will 
> > likely to result in this classification to allow more entity-types than one 
> > or more of its super-types.
> >     
> >     Also, move this to resolveReferencesPhase3(), as typeAndAllSubTypes 
> > won't be populated until resolveReferencesPhase2() is complete.
> >     
> >     
> >     void resolveReferencesPhase3(AtlasTypeRegistry typeRegistry) throws 
> > AtlasBaseException {
> >       ...
> >     
> >       Set<String> superTypeEntityTypes = null;
> >     
> >       for (String superType : this.allSuperTypes) {
> >         AtlasClassificationDef superTypeDef    = 
> > typeRegistry.getClassificationDefByName(superType);
> >         Set<String>            entityTypeNames = 
> > superTypeDef.getEntityTypes();
> >     
> >         if (CollectionUtils.isEmpty(entityTypeNames)) { // no restrictions 
> > specified
> >           continue;
> >         }
> >     
> >         // classification is applicable for specified entity-types and 
> > their sub-entity-types
> >         Set<String> typesAndSubEntityTypes = 
> > getEntityTypesAndAllSubTypes(entityTypeNames);
> >     
> >         if (superTypeEntityTypes == null) {
> >           superTypeEntityTypes = new 
> > HashSet<String>(typesAndSubEntityTypes);
> >         } else {
> >           superTypeEntityTypes.retainAll(typesAndSubEntityTypes);
> >         }
> >       }
> >     
> >       if (superTypeEntityTypes != null) { // restrictions are specified in 
> > super-types
> >         if (CollectionUtils.isEmpty(superTypeEntityTypes)) { // 
> > restrictions in super-types are disjoint! TODO: need a new error code for 
> > this case
> >             throw new 
> > AtlasBaseException(AtlasErrorCode.CLASSIFICATIONDEF_ENTITYTYPES_NOT_PARENTS_SUBSET,
> >  classificationDef.getName(), classificationDef.getEntityTypes());
> >         }
> >     
> >         if (CollectionUtils.isEmpty(classificationDef.getEntityTypes())) { 
> > // no restriction specified; use the restrictions from super-types
> >           this.entityTypes = superTypeEntityTypes;
> >         } else {
> >           this.entityTypes = 
> > getEntityTypesAndAllSubTypes(classificationDef.getEntityTypes());
> >     
> >           if (!superTypeEntityTypes.containsAll(this.entityTypes)) {
> >             throw new 
> > AtlasBaseException(AtlasErrorCode.CLASSIFICATIONDEF_ENTITYTYPES_NOT_PARENTS_SUBSET,
> >  classificationDef.getName(), classificationDef.getEntityTypes());
> >           }
> >         }
> >       } else { // no restrictions specified in super-types
> >         this.entityTypes = 
> > getEntityTypesAndAllSubTypes(classificationDef.getEntityTypes());
> >       }
> >     }
> >     
> >     private Set<String> getEntityTypesAndAllSubTypes(Set<String> 
> > entityTypes, AtlasTypeRegistry typeRegistry) {
> >       Set<String> ret = new HashSet<>();
> >     
> >       for (String typeName : entityTypes) {
> >         AtlasEntityType entityType = 
> > typeRegistry.getEntityTypeByName(typeName);
> >     
> >         ret.addAll(entityType.getTypeAndAllSubTypes());
> >       }
> >     
> >       return ret;
> >     }

agreed


> On Sept. 1, 2017, 8:18 p.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> > intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/type/AtlasEntityType.java
> > Lines 450 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61526/diff/3/?file=1810643#file1810643line450>
> >
> >     No need to make this method public - please review my comment in 
> > AtlasClassificationType.canApplyToEntityType()

reverted this change


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61526/#review184373
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 12, 2017, 12:09 p.m., David Radley wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61526/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 12, 2017, 12:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for atlas, Graham Wallis, Madhan Neethiraj, and Sarath 
> Subramanian.
> 
> 
> Repository: atlas
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> ATLAS-2029: Restrict entities, classifications can be applied to
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/AtlasErrorCode.java 
> 2503d8ef203cf4efbe15b440257b1da2252b6153 
>   
> intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/model/typedef/AtlasClassificationDef.java 
> eeaf71413a56c08db8170fd3323b8e8245ae44fe 
>   intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/type/AtlasClassificationType.java 
> cc3e45ed2f059ad0c5731dc1da7e592d139c3e7a 
>   intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/type/AtlasEntityType.java 
> 28215fd2aa33ec8011f6900b68c672b685053e7a 
>   intg/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/type/AtlasTypeUtil.java 
> ab063e23e355f74668af389b97f7da03b2a8f90f 
>   intg/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/TestUtilsV2.java 
> fc65af057255b4c17378080ee4fb7cbfc780c3fe 
>   intg/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/model/ModelTestUtil.java 
> e1ca889fba1540015850a57232936abad8fd6f37 
>   intg/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/type/TestAtlasClassificationType.java 
> aaf4a6ac0a978e5eb6de41279cae1b1c82373374 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasClassificationDefStoreV1.java
>  e3aa4e0b2317bec47426a914f6feae68b17851dd 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityStoreV1.java
>  1c168b4cff0d105c7a0d4a9fbdb50871388c917e 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasGraphUtilsV1.java
>  227f7cd12a9b23c3bbc1cfdc40d06616ea775ca4 
>   
> repository/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasTypeDefGraphStoreV1.java
>  f639ea56e6188837e069a5fcba953d9d196af0e5 
>   
> repository/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/AtlasTypeDefGraphStoreTest.java
>  8638a7f17e8a17d3a6e0bfb94879b5c5406be1a3 
>   
> repository/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/repository/store/graph/v1/AtlasEntityStoreV1Test.java
>  62fad5b02a7229d9bc3083690980eb063756bc29 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61526/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Testing
> performed unit tests
> 
> Using postman
> 1) create an entityDef  aaa
> 2) create a classificationDef with an entitytype  aaaa - checked that it is 
> in the response
> 3) Create a entity instance of aaa
> 4) add the classification to it
> 5) Create an entity instance with a different type bbbb
> 6) Attempt to add the classification to bbbb. this fails with an informative 
> message
> 7) Attempt to update the ClassificationDef to remove the entity type - this 
> fails with an informative message
> 8) Attempt to update the classificationdef to add bbbb. this update works. 
> 9) Attempt to add an entity type that does not exist to the 
> ClassificationDef. this should fail.  
> 10) Attempt to update an entity type that does not exist to the 
> ClassificationDef. this should fail.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Radley
> 
>

Reply via email to