[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16180893#comment-16180893
]
Pierre Padovani commented on ATLAS-1690:
----------------------------------------
[~davidrad] Thanks for the explanation.
What is the status of this work? I've tried using 0.9 and have found the new
relationship system to be a bit unstable in regards to the legacy
compatibility. I've also noticed that the existing lineage API does not
function correctly in conjunction with an implementation that uses relationship
defs. The exact same model without defined relationship defs, functions
correctly in 0.8.1.
Thanks!
Pierre
> Introduce top level relationships
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: ATLAS-1690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1690
> Project: Atlas
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: David Radley
> Assignee: David Radley
> Labels: VirtualDataConnector
> Attachments: Atlas_RelationDef_Json_Structure_v1.pdf, Atlas
> Relationships proposal v1.0.pdf, Atlas Relationships proposal v1.10.pdf,
> Atlas Relationships proposal v1.1.pdf, Atlas Relationships proposal v1.2.pdf,
> Atlas Relationships proposal v1.3.pdf, Atlas Relationships proposal v1.4.pdf,
> Atlas Relationships proposal v1.5.pdf, Atlas Relationships proposal v1.6.pdf,
> Atlas Relationships proposal v1.7.pdf, Atlas Relationships proposal v1.8.pdf,
> Atlas Relationships proposal v1.9.pdf
>
>
> Introduce top level relationships including support for
> -many to many relationships
> - relationship names including the name for both ends and the relationship.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
