I don't have an issue with #3, but we will be using it in production, specifically with the Scylladb implementation.
Out of curiosity, what exactly are the issues? On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Apoorv Naik <an...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > #3 sounds like a better option for now. +1 > > On 4/27/18, 12:42 AM, "Nigel Jones" <nigel.l.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 2018/04/26 16:14:06, David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: > > > 3) Document it in the same way as the embedded solr and hbase build. > That > > +1 for this option #3 > > If in future someone has a need for production support I'm sure they > will get engaged and help in testing etc :-) > > > >
