> On May 26, 2018, 2:27 p.m., David Radley wrote: > >
Hi David, I don't believe the relational piece of the open metadata types was available when I originally needed the rdbms types about 5 months ago. I had actually checked to see if something already existed before creating my own. I confess I didn't check again before submitting my version. They look very similar, though I don't see indexes represented. Also, primary and foreign keys are represented in the open metadata types via tags... Can you tell me why that choice was made? Foreign keys in particular with their source and target tables and columns seem a tad complex for tags... - Barbara ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67332/#review203934 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 25, 2018, 11:48 p.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/67332/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 25, 2018, 11:48 p.m.) > > > Review request for atlas, Apoorv Naik, Ashutosh Mestry, and Sarath > Subramanian. > > > Bugs: ATLAS-2709 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-2709 > > > Repository: atlas > > > Description > ------- > > added model containing RDBMS typedefs - author: Barbara Eckman > > > Diffs > ----- > > addons/models/2000-RDBMS/2010-rdbms_model.json PRE-CREATION > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67332/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > - verified that Atlas successfully loads RDBMS model file contents > > > Thanks, > > Madhan Neethiraj > >
