[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Hello CoCooo updated ATLAS-3119:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
Hi, in *incubator-atlas-release-0.8.3* (*\addons\storm-bridge-shim* module), 
duplicate classes with the same fully-qualified name 
_*org.apache.log4j.Logger*_ are included in two different libraries, i.e., 
*org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:1.6.6* and *log4j:log4j:1.2.17*.

According to _"first declaration wins"_ class loading strategy, only this class 
in *org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:1.6.6* can be loaded, and that in 
*log4j:log4j:1.2.17* will be shadowed.

By further analyzing, your project expects to invoke method 
*<org.apache.log4j.Logger: boolean isTraceEnabled()>* in *log4j:log4j:1.2.17*. 
As it has been shadowed, so that this method defined in 
*org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:1.6.**_6_* is actually forced to be referenced via 
the following invocation path:
{code:java}
// code placeholder
<org.apache.atlas.storm.hook.StormAtlasHook: void <clinit>()> 
D:\testcase\TestProject\incubator-atlas-release-0.8-rc1\addons\storm-bridge-shim\target\classes

<org.slf4j.LoggerFactory: org.slf4j.Logger getLogger(java.lang.Class)> 
D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-api\1.7.21\slf4j-api-1.7.21.jar

<org.slf4j.LoggerFactory: org.slf4j.Logger getLogger(java.lang.String)> 
D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-api\1.7.21\slf4j-api-1.7.21.jar

<org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerFactory: org.slf4j.Logger 
getLogger(java.lang.String)> 
D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-log4j12\1.7.21\slf4j-log4j12-1.7.21.jar

<org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter: void <init>(org.apache.log4j.Logger)> 
D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-log4j12\1.7.21\slf4j-log4j12-1.7.21.jar

<org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter: boolean isTraceCapable()> 
D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-log4j12\1.7.21\slf4j-log4j12-1.7.21.jar

<org.apache.log4j.Logger: boolean isTraceEnabled()>
{code}
Although both of these two conflicting classes contain the referenced methods 
(with the same signature), they have different implementations. This issue will 
not lead to runtime crashes, but it can introduce inconsistent semantic 
hehavior by changing the control flows and data flows.

*_Workaround solution:_*
 An easy way to workaround the problem is *_reversing the declaration order_* 
of these two libraries i n pom file.
 Then, according to *_"first declaration wins"_* class loading strategy, class 
*org.apache.log4j.Logger* in *log4j:log4j:1.2.17* can be loaded (the version 
that *log4j:log4j:1.2.17* expects to reference by static analysis).
 This fix will not affect other libraries or class, except the above duplicate 
class.

 

*Dependency tree--*

[INFO] — maven-dependency-plugin:2.10:tree (default-cli) @ storm-bridge-shim —

[INFO] org.apache.atlas:storm-bridge-shim:jar:0.8-incubating

[INFO] +- org.apache.atlas:atlas-plugin-classloader:jar:0.8-incubating:compile

[INFO] +- org.apache.storm:storm-core:jar:1.0.0:compile

[INFO] |  +- com.esotericsoftware:kryo:jar:3.0.3:compile

[INFO] |  |  +- com.esotericsoftware:reflectasm:jar:1.10.1:compile

[INFO] |  |  |  - org.ow2.asm:asm:jar:5.0.3:compile

[INFO] |  |  +- com.esotericsoftware:minlog:jar:1.3.0:compile

[INFO] |  |  - org.objenesis:objenesis:jar:2.1:compile

[INFO] |  +- org.clojure:clojure:jar:1.7.0:compile

[INFO] |  +- com.lmax:disruptor:jar:3.3.2:compile

[INFO] |  +- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:jar:2.1:compile

[INFO] |  +- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core:jar:2.1:compile

[INFO] |  +- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j-impl:jar:2.1:compile

[INFO] |  +- _*org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:jar:1.6.6:compile*_

[INFO] |  - javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:2.5:compile

[INFO] +- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.7.21:compile

[INFO] +- org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12:jar:1.7.21:compile

[INFO] |  - _*log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile*_

[INFO] - org.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j:jar:1.7.21:compile

 

Thank you very much.
 Best,
 Coco

  was:
Hi, in *incubator-atlas-release-0.8.3* (*\addons\storm-bridge-shim* module), 
duplicate classes with the same fully-qualified name 
_*org.apache.log4j.Logger*_ are included in two different libraries, i.e., 
*org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:1.6.6* and *log4j:log4j:1.2.17*.

According to _"first declaration wins"_ class loading strategy, only this class 
in *org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:1.6.6* can be loaded, and that in 
*log4j:log4j:1.2.17* will be shadowed.

By further analyzing, your project expects to invoke method 
*<org.apache.log4j.Logger: boolean isTraceEnabled()>* in *log4j:log4j:1.2.17*. 
As it has been shadowed, so that this method defined in 
*org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:1.6.**_6_* is actually forced to be referenced via 
the following invocation path:
{code:java}
// code placeholder
<org.apache.atlas.storm.hook.StormAtlasHook: void <clinit>()> 
D:\testcase\TestProject\incubator-atlas-release-0.8-rc1\addons\storm-bridge-shim\target\classes

<org.slf4j.LoggerFactory: org.slf4j.Logger getLogger(java.lang.Class)> 
D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-api\1.7.21\slf4j-api-1.7.21.jar

<org.slf4j.LoggerFactory: org.slf4j.Logger getLogger(java.lang.String)> 
D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-api\1.7.21\slf4j-api-1.7.21.jar

<org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerFactory: org.slf4j.Logger 
getLogger(java.lang.String)> 
D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-log4j12\1.7.21\slf4j-log4j12-1.7.21.jar

<org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter: void <init>(org.apache.log4j.Logger)> 
D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-log4j12\1.7.21\slf4j-log4j12-1.7.21.jar

<org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter: boolean isTraceCapable()> 
D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-log4j12\1.7.21\slf4j-log4j12-1.7.21.jar

<org.apache.log4j.Logger: boolean isTraceEnabled()>
{code}
Although both of these two conflicting classes contain the referenced methods 
(with the same signature), they have different implementations. This issue will 
not lead to runtime crashes, but it can introduce inconsistent semantic 
hehavior by changing the control flows and data flows.

*_Workaround solution:_*
 An easy way to workaround the problem is *_reversing the declaration order_* 
of these two libraries i n pom file.
 Then, according to *_"first declaration wins"_* class loading strategy, class 
*org.apache.log4j.Logger* in *org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:1.6.6* can be loaded 
(the version that *log4j:log4j:1.2.17* expects to reference by static analysis).
 This fix will not affect other libraries or class, except the above duplicate 
class.

 

*Dependency tree--*

[INFO] — maven-dependency-plugin:2.10:tree (default-cli) @ storm-bridge-shim —

[INFO] org.apache.atlas:storm-bridge-shim:jar:0.8-incubating

[INFO] +- org.apache.atlas:atlas-plugin-classloader:jar:0.8-incubating:compile

[INFO] +- org.apache.storm:storm-core:jar:1.0.0:compile

[INFO] |  +- com.esotericsoftware:kryo:jar:3.0.3:compile

[INFO] |  |  +- com.esotericsoftware:reflectasm:jar:1.10.1:compile

[INFO] |  |  |  - org.ow2.asm:asm:jar:5.0.3:compile

[INFO] |  |  +- com.esotericsoftware:minlog:jar:1.3.0:compile

[INFO] |  |  - org.objenesis:objenesis:jar:2.1:compile

[INFO] |  +- org.clojure:clojure:jar:1.7.0:compile

[INFO] |  +- com.lmax:disruptor:jar:3.3.2:compile

[INFO] |  +- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:jar:2.1:compile

[INFO] |  +- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core:jar:2.1:compile

[INFO] |  +- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j-impl:jar:2.1:compile

[INFO] |  +- _*org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:jar:1.6.6:compile*_

[INFO] |  - javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:2.5:compile

[INFO] +- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.7.21:compile

[INFO] +- org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12:jar:1.7.21:compile

[INFO] |  - _*log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile*_

[INFO] - org.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j:jar:1.7.21:compile

 

Thank you very much.
 Best,
 Coco


> Dependency Conflict: duplicate classes "org.apache.log4j.Logger" in different 
> JARs, have different implementations
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ATLAS-3119
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3119
>             Project: Atlas
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components:  atlas-core
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.3
>            Reporter: Hello CoCooo
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.8.4
>
>
> Hi, in *incubator-atlas-release-0.8.3* (*\addons\storm-bridge-shim* module), 
> duplicate classes with the same fully-qualified name 
> _*org.apache.log4j.Logger*_ are included in two different libraries, i.e., 
> *org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:1.6.6* and *log4j:log4j:1.2.17*.
> According to _"first declaration wins"_ class loading strategy, only this 
> class in *org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:1.6.6* can be loaded, and that in 
> *log4j:log4j:1.2.17* will be shadowed.
> By further analyzing, your project expects to invoke method 
> *<org.apache.log4j.Logger: boolean isTraceEnabled()>* in 
> *log4j:log4j:1.2.17*. As it has been shadowed, so that this method defined in 
> *org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:1.6.**_6_* is actually forced to be referenced 
> via the following invocation path:
> {code:java}
> // code placeholder
> <org.apache.atlas.storm.hook.StormAtlasHook: void <clinit>()> 
> D:\testcase\TestProject\incubator-atlas-release-0.8-rc1\addons\storm-bridge-shim\target\classes
> <org.slf4j.LoggerFactory: org.slf4j.Logger getLogger(java.lang.Class)> 
> D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-api\1.7.21\slf4j-api-1.7.21.jar
> <org.slf4j.LoggerFactory: org.slf4j.Logger getLogger(java.lang.String)> 
> D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-api\1.7.21\slf4j-api-1.7.21.jar
> <org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerFactory: org.slf4j.Logger 
> getLogger(java.lang.String)> 
> D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-log4j12\1.7.21\slf4j-log4j12-1.7.21.jar
> <org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter: void <init>(org.apache.log4j.Logger)> 
> D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-log4j12\1.7.21\slf4j-log4j12-1.7.21.jar
> <org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter: boolean isTraceCapable()> 
> D:\cEnvironment\repository\org\slf4j\slf4j-log4j12\1.7.21\slf4j-log4j12-1.7.21.jar
> <org.apache.log4j.Logger: boolean isTraceEnabled()>
> {code}
> Although both of these two conflicting classes contain the referenced methods 
> (with the same signature), they have different implementations. This issue 
> will not lead to runtime crashes, but it can introduce inconsistent semantic 
> hehavior by changing the control flows and data flows.
> *_Workaround solution:_*
>  An easy way to workaround the problem is *_reversing the declaration order_* 
> of these two libraries i n pom file.
>  Then, according to *_"first declaration wins"_* class loading strategy, 
> class *org.apache.log4j.Logger* in *log4j:log4j:1.2.17* can be loaded (the 
> version that *log4j:log4j:1.2.17* expects to reference by static analysis).
>  This fix will not affect other libraries or class, except the above 
> duplicate class.
>  
> *Dependency tree--*
> [INFO] — maven-dependency-plugin:2.10:tree (default-cli) @ storm-bridge-shim —
> [INFO] org.apache.atlas:storm-bridge-shim:jar:0.8-incubating
> [INFO] +- org.apache.atlas:atlas-plugin-classloader:jar:0.8-incubating:compile
> [INFO] +- org.apache.storm:storm-core:jar:1.0.0:compile
> [INFO] |  +- com.esotericsoftware:kryo:jar:3.0.3:compile
> [INFO] |  |  +- com.esotericsoftware:reflectasm:jar:1.10.1:compile
> [INFO] |  |  |  - org.ow2.asm:asm:jar:5.0.3:compile
> [INFO] |  |  +- com.esotericsoftware:minlog:jar:1.3.0:compile
> [INFO] |  |  - org.objenesis:objenesis:jar:2.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.clojure:clojure:jar:1.7.0:compile
> [INFO] |  +- com.lmax:disruptor:jar:3.3.2:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:jar:2.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core:jar:2.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j-impl:jar:2.1:compile
> [INFO] |  +- _*org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:jar:1.6.6:compile*_
> [INFO] |  - javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:2.5:compile
> [INFO] +- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.7.21:compile
> [INFO] +- org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12:jar:1.7.21:compile
> [INFO] |  - _*log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile*_
> [INFO] - org.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j:jar:1.7.21:compile
>  
> Thank you very much.
>  Best,
>  Coco



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to