Diego Marino Monetti created ATLAS-3227:
-------------------------------------------

             Summary: Bulk delete does not delete the indexes properly
                 Key: ATLAS-3227
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-3227
             Project: Atlas
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components:  atlas-core
    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
         Environment: All
            Reporter: Diego Marino Monetti
             Fix For: 2.0.0
         Attachments: application-with-patch.log, 
application-without-patch.log, bulkCreateType, bulkDeleteType, sample_type.json

Currently the Bulk Delete, first clears the cache and then does physical 
deletion from Janus of the required types. At the end of this operation it 
cycles through the attributes of the deleted types and for those attributes for 
which it is possible to have indexes, built-ins, enums and structs, marks the 
indexes as deleted. Since for each attribute the routine goes back to the type 
of attribute using the typeRegistry, that is the cache, if this attribute is a 
custom type the attribute was deleted before and the bulk delete partially 
fails.


In particular, for each attribute in which this error does not occur, for 
example because built-in type, a label delete is added to the property key with 
the number of occurrences with which this property key is present in the store. 
Something like property_key_deleted_0. In fact, if you try to reload the same 
types and re-delete,  the property keys are now marked as 
property_key_deleted_1.


If, however, for the aforementioned reason the search for the type in the cache 
fails the property key is not marked and remains fully active, which, from what 
I can understand at this level of my knowledge, generates at least some MEMORY 
LEAKs.


If I reload the types with the same entities and attributes it seems to be all 
right, but if I change some attributes, in my opinion, the result is 
unpredictable.

This path tested on version 2.0 and SNAPSHOT 3.0 would resolve this issue.
In attachment there is a small example that shows this behavior with and 
without this patch



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to