[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15193228#comment-15193228
]
ATLAS QA commented on ATLAS-539:
--------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12793294/ATLAS-539-v3.patch
against master revision 44dbfe5.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new
or modified test files.
{color:red}-1 javac{color}. The applied patch generated 98 javac
compiler warnings (more than the master's current 94 warnings).
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
+1 checkstyle. The patch generated 0 code style errors.
{color:red}-1 findbugs{color}. The patch appears to introduce 339 new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in :
./webapp/test-output/junitreports/TEST-org.apache.atlas.web.resources.TypesJerseyResourceIT
./webapp/test-output/junitreports/TEST-org.apache.atlas.web.resources.AdminJerseyResourceIT
./webapp/test-output/junitreports/TEST-org.apache.atlas.web.resources.RexsterGraphJerseyResourceIT
./webapp/test-output/junitreports/TEST-org.apache.atlas.web.resources.EntityJerseyResourceIT
./webapp/test-output/junitreports/TEST-org.apache.atlas.web.resources.MetadataDiscoveryJerseyResourceIT
./webapp/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.atlas.web.resources.HiveLineageJerseyResourceIT
./webapp/target/failsafe-reports/junitreports/TEST-org.apache.atlas.web.resources.HiveLineageJerseyResourceIT
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningsrepository.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningscommon.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningsnotification.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningswebapp.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningsclient.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningstypesystem.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningssqoop-bridge.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshive-bridge.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningsstorm-bridge.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningstitan.html
Javac warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//artifact/patchprocess/diffJavacWarnings.txt
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ATLAS-Build/69//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Store for entity audit events
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: ATLAS-539
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-539
> Project: Atlas
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Shwetha G S
> Assignee: Shwetha G S
> Fix For: 0.7-incubating
>
> Attachments: ATLAS-539-v2.patch, ATLAS-539-v3.patch, ATLAS-539.patch
>
>
> We need to store the entity update events in some store. The search supported
> should return all events for a given entity id within some timerange.
> Two choices are:
> 1. Existing graph db - We can create a vertex for every update with
> properties for entity id, timestamp, action and details. This will create
> disjoint vertices. The direct gremlin search is enough to retrieve all events
> for the entity.
> Pros - We already have configurations for graph and utilities to store/get
> from graph
> Cons - It will create extra data and doesn't fit the graph model
> 2. HBase - Store events with key = entity id + timestamp and columns for
> action and details. The table scan supports the required search
> Pros - Fits the data model
> Cons - We will need the configurations and code to read and write from hbase
> In either case, we should expose an interface so that alternative
> implementations can be added
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
