Hi Madhan,
That would be great :-)  thanks, David. 


From:   Madhan Neethiraj <[email protected]>
To:     "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date:   23/09/2016 16:48
Subject:        Re: Rename trait to classification
Sent by:        Madhan Neethiraj <[email protected]>



David,

I agree on replacing ‘trait’ with ‘Classification’. I guess the name 
‘triat’ might have been influenced by Scala (and not from Ranger, which 
doesn’t have ‘triat’ in its vocab..).

Instead of renaming in the existing APIs, how about we go with the new 
name in the API introduced in ATLAS-1171?

Thanks,
Madhan



On 9/23/16, 1:35 AM, "David Radley" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi, 
    I have raised Jira ATLAS-1187. This is to rename trait to 
Classification. 
    I know that this would effect the API, so am keen to understand how we 

    agree to version the API maybe including other changes. I feel trait 
is 
    not very descriptive and I assume comes from Ranger terminology. I 
think 
    using classification instead brings us into using terminology better 
    representing the Atlas capability and its role in governance use 
cases. I 
    am keen to get your feedback. I do not feel that I should just submit 
a 
    fix like this - I think we need more agreement to account for the 
impact 
    on current users. At the same time, we are still in incubation we 
should 
    be able to make changes like this to polish the API.
 
    I am looking forward to your thoughts,       David Radley 
    Unless stated otherwise above:
    IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with 
number 
    741598. 
    Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 
3AU
 





Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Reply via email to