[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15747915#comment-15747915
]
David Radley commented on ATLAS-1254:
-------------------------------------
I am thinking that in addition to the optional owning glossary category. A term
could have different types of associated relationships, which could be
1) has a
2) antonym
3) homonym
4) replaces / replaced by. So the glossary can contain replacement knowledge
explicitly rather than in rename history.
5) relationship to 0 or more other glossary categories
6) a verb relationship . for example to be able to hold the information behind
a statement like ' The customer C owns account A.'
> Ability to add relationships to a term
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: ATLAS-1254
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1254
> Project: Atlas
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: David Radley
> Assignee: David Radley
>
> Ability to add has relationships to a term. I suggest that to do this
> consistently , terms should be implemented as entities - thereby picking up
> the ability to have attributes, relationships (including has) and guids
> (non-name) identity.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
