oh hm, I thought it started as soon as the task was launched, if it already
starts the timer at RUNNING never mind then :)

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Maxim Khutornenko <[email protected]> wrote:

> >Does this also include making the timer for "initial_interval_secs" start
> >when the task enters RUNNING?
>
> Did you rather mean STARTING as in AURORA-894? The
> "initial_interval_sec" currently starts in RUNNING and AURORA-894
> suggests moving it into STARTING.
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Steve Niemitz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > +100.  This is particularly annoying with docker tasks, as the task
> doesn't
> > enter running until the pull completes.
> >
> > Does this also include making the timer for "initial_interval_secs" start
> > when the task enters RUNNING?
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joseph Smith <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Also a +1, users can’t do anything to modify this other than just
> increase
> >> this threshold in case we don’t do the right thing.
> >>
> >> > On Apr 2, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Joshua Cohen <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Zameer Manji <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> +1
> >> >>
> >> >> I think we should be very careful in the future to ensure user
> provided
> >> >> timeouts do not cover state transitions outside of their control.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:29 PM, David McLaughlin <
> [email protected]
> >> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> +1 to the proposal.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Maxim Khutornenko <[email protected]
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> We are proposing to drop the UpdateConfig restart_threshold setting
> >> >>>> due to not delivering much end user value. Please, take a moment to
> >> >>>> read through https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1240 and
> >> >>>> reply back if you have any doubts.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>> Maxim
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Zameer Manji
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to