we should probably spend some time before .10 going through and cleaning up deprecation todo's left in the code also. I've added this to the Aurora Roadmap Google doc
-Jake On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Bill Farner <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree, documentation overhauls are best decoupled from releases. > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Jake Farrell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Think that this is a great idea and agree that we need to spend some time > > improving our user content, but it should not be a blocker to the next > > release candidate. Improving our documentation and website should be an > > ongoing effort > > > > -Jake > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Zameer Manji <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > One thing I would like to see in 0.10.0 is improvement to our > > > documentation. We have a lot of documentation but I don't think it is > > well > > > organized or very accessible to a new user or a prospective user. This > > > might involve writing new documentation, improving our, website, etc. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Bill Farner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > In 0.10.0 i would like to see: > > > > > > > > - groundwork and initial endpoints in a REST API (part of AURORA-987) > > > > > > > > - thermos executor support for a simple task description. this would > > be > > > a > > > > dramatically reduced json schema that the executor can consume for > > simple > > > > use cases where the user is invoking a single shell command > > > > > > > > - support for custom executors (AURORA-1376) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Zameer Manji <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > As discussed in today's IRC meeting I will be heading up the 0.10.0 > > > > > release. What would people like to see in this release? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Zameer Manji > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Zameer Manji > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
