Stephan - you could install jq within the vagrant provisioning as a
workaround in the meantime.

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Erb, Stephan <stephan....@blue-yonder.com>
wrote:

> Short heads up: I believe I might be blocking the release candidate right
> now :-/.
>
> * Goal was to get https://reviews.apache.org/r/45177/ merged
> * Before we can merge this, we need  to rebuild of the vagrant base image
> due to this change https://reviews.apache.org/r/45782/
> * Unfortunately, I don't get to the e2e tests to pass in the newly
> generated image. I therefore don't feel comfortable pushing forward here
>
> I won't be able to look into this before Friday evening. Hopefully I get
> it resolved on Friday (unless someone else wants to have a look first)
> ________________________________________
> From: Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 23:14
> To: dev@aurora.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1, fire away
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Other than a couple deprecation clean up tickets, in AURORA-1584 [1],
> it
> >> > looks like we are about ready to cut the 0.13.0 release candidate and
> >> start
> >> > a vote. I wanted to open the floor up for any last minute requests or
> >> > patches people would like to see make it in before we finalize and cut
> >> the
> >> > release candidate. Currently planning on cutting the release candidate
> >> this
> >> > Wednesday, April 6th, pending no blockers coming out of this
> discussion
> >> > thread. Thoughts, objections?
> >> >
> >> > -Jake
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1584
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Zameer Manji
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to