+1 On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 5:48 PM Nicolas Donatucci <ndonatu...@medallia.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:11 PM, David McLaughlin <dmclaugh...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Jordan Ly <jordan....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Renan DelValle <re...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > Kicking the vote off with a +1 from me since I feel it will simplify > > our > > > > patch submission process and lower the difficulty bar for new > > > contributors. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:14 AM Renan DelValle <re...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> All, > > > >> > > > >> I propose we move our project into the GitBox service. This will > allow > > > us > > > >> to read and write to our repositories on the GitHub platform > enabling > > > us to > > > >> accept pull requests for both the aurora and aurora-packaging > > > repositories. > > > >> > > > >> If this vote passes, the pull request workflow will replace our > > current > > > >> ReviewBoard patch submission process. > > > >> > > > >> The vote will close on Tuesday Jun 19th 2018 at 11:30:00 San > Francisco > > > >> time. > > > >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Move the aurora and aurora-packaging repositories to the > Apache > > > >> GitBox service > > > >> [ ] +0 > > > >> [ ] -1 Keep the aurora and aurora-packaging repositories on GitHub > as > > a > > > >> read only mirrors because... > > > >> > > > > > >
