Paul Hammant wrote, On 08/02/2003 13.12:
Nicola,Folks,
Given the project is inviable under Apache rule (3 active committers et al), I propose AvalonDB should go to SourceForge. The same viability rules govern db.apache.org as they do here.
Paul, this is not completely correct. Incubation is a possible alternative, and the db project has/will probably have a sandbox where to make it grow. BTW, AxionDB will most probably move there too, soon.
Incubator has a min committer limit of two. Whilst I have a fellow waiting in the wings to help me on this, I can't get him into Apache because of the six-month-of-patches rule.
Wuzthat? Do we have a six-month-of-patches rule in incubator? Doh ;-)
Axion is more developed than AvalonDB. There is no reason that a second database would be required here at Apache.If you feel the need to not follow AxionDB, there is a reason. That reason is the same one that makes me think that there is space here for AvalonDB.
This does not mean (I want to be clear) that I don't want AvalonDB to go to SF. Just trying to make the decision aware of all the options.
How is the altrmi setup doing in incubator? ;-)
Doh. The requests were made, but still have to be done. Oh well...
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
