Huw Roberts wrote:
Hi,

It seems the addition of the PUnitTestCase means the junit jar is needed to compile. I'd like to add a check for it like framework has... does that sound ok?
+1

Also, would be desirable/feasible to exclude the dependant code if junit is not found?
+1

go for it!

- Leo



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to