Berin Loritsch wrote:

I have put together a suite of components for Phase I.

The location is here:

http://avalon.apache.org/~bloritsch/excalibur-dist/

Let me know what you think.


Excalibur i18n

1. Does not need to be in the list.

Excalibur Component (ECM)

1. Excalibur component documentation (index.html link to JavaDoc
   points to the entire Avalon Javadoc - not the local component
   package javadoc).
2. Excalibur Component index.html describes TestCase and not ECM
3. excalibur-component and excalibur-component-complete have identical
   extension names in their respective manifests (should be changed)

Excalibur Instrument

1. Excalibur instrument documentation (index.html link to JavaDoc
   points to the entire Avalon Javadoc - not the local instrument
   package javadoc).
2. Content of the link to Insrument Manager needs to be improved.
3. Content of the link to Insrument Client needs to be improved.
4. How-To links should be removed as they don't contain anything.

Excalibur Instrument Manager

1. seperation of instrument manager interfaces from implementation
   is good however the AltRMI classes should be seperated out into
   and independent server side AltRMI monitor package that should
   probably be colocated with the instrument client (i.e. client and
   server jars for an AltRMI monitoring solution) - see multiple
   prior emails on this subject.

Excalibur Logger 1.0.1

1. Content of the documentation is all about i18n, not Logger!
2. Excalibur logger documentation (index.html link to JavaDoc
   points to the entire Avalon Javadoc - not the local logger
   package javadoc).

Excalibur Pool 1.2

1. Content of the documentation is all about i18n, not Pool!
2. Excalibur pool documentation (index.html link to JavaDoc
   points to the entire Avalon Javadoc - not the local pool
   package javadoc).

Excalibur TestCase 1.0

1. The is zero documentation - at least an example should
   be presented and perhaps a table of the principal
   classes.
2. Excalibur testcase documentation (index.html link to JavaDoc
   points to the entire Avalon Javadoc - not the local
   package javadoc).

Cheers, Steve.



Also, are the version numbers right?


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--


Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to