On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 07:18 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 10:49, Peter Royal wrote:
On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 05:51 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
you do realize that this renders any protection offered by proxies
absolutely
useless. Thhis and the invocationhandler were deliberately made package
access.

whoops! I have reverted and added information into the javadocs to that
effect.

We may want expose the functionality you require via a protected final method
in a new AbstractProxyHandler or even the base AbstractComponentHandler. What
exactly do you need access for?

Just for its proxy-creating functionality, proxying an object with all interfaces except for the lifecycle ones.


I had to switch from using the fortress serviceselector to making my own "selector" component/container and just wanted to leverage that class. I'm either going to leave the jar i build modified or copy the classes into my tree (and make them protected for the same reasons :)
-pete



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to