Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Stephen,
He is referring to me, which I find more of an amusement than anything else.
As far as the interface is concerned, I don't believe that he responded when
asked for his use case from which it was clear that no one would ever want
to have more than one listener. I take it from your comments that you do
have a use case for more than one listener. Whilest we wait for his, would
you please share yours?
Hi Noel:
The use case I'm referring to is hypothetical (basically I looking forward and considering how a single block can provide aggregated monitoring on resource usage - because of the hierarchical structure of blocks and the characteristic of potentially sharing a common logging system, there may exist a requirement for multiple listeners). However - I don't particular want to get into a debate about this subject - we've done that already - and practical experimentation on this is probably several months away.
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osm.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
