Berin Loritsch wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Berin Loritsch wrote:
The configuration builder might be useful in a future life, so I
don't really want to get rid of it yet. Do we have a parent context
that it can be merged into? Perhaps Naming?
What does the configuration buider do? Is it relavant/consitent to/with the excalibur-confiuration family?
Same thing the SAXConfigurationBuilder in Framework does.
So how about moving it into the excalibur-configuration package?
Cheere, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osm.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
