Peter Donald wrote:

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 07:52, Berin Loritsch wrote:


Peter Donald wrote:


On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 01:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Exactly what is it that you are doing ? Could you revert it to the way it
was a week ago so it is backwards compatible?


Is it really breaking your code?


does it matter - it is not backwards compatible.



Pete:


Could you please provide a more verbose version of your problem. Could you explain what it is that is backward incompatible such that Berin and other may be able to contribute to the issue in a constructive manner? In the meantime I have every confidence that Berin is dealing with this appropriately and if an issue exists - he will raise it for discussion or resolve it as appropriate. I am equally confident that your opinions (once presented clearly) will be taken into consideration.

Steve.

--

Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to