Jason van Zyl wrote, On 08/03/2003 17.30:
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 09:37, Leo Simons wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
if its also acceptable that I move these projects to Maven.
Any opinions?
+1
These projects are sandbox projects.
The issues I had with using Maven for Avalon *now* are not applicable IMO in the sandbox; on the contrary I welcome any experimentation there that can make us understand more things.
NOTE: Centipede has now been proposed to Ant, and we are in the process of friutfully discussing on how to better serve Ant.
... > A road map for Maven will be released on Monday part of
which will be an outline Maven being turned into an Avalon component.
Avalon should use as much things that relate to its codebase as possible. This is one of the reasons why I strongly favor using Cocoon (Forrest) for the doc generation. And the reason why I personally encourage Stephen to make Merlin use Maven.
Add to this that I am a Forrest developer, and that I can't wait to have Forrest work nicely with Maven (yes, I do want to get to a single HTML2 DTD), you have my
+1
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
