you should not be worrying about cvs structure so much. End users don't see it. We should use the cvs setup that makes it easiest to develop.

In the meantime, responding to the implied "lifecycle extensions are part of the framework":

lifecycle extensions are but one way of several setups currently in use for accomplishing a certain goal. So the lifecycle stuff is not a "standard extension" of avalon-framework, just "an extension".

cheers,

- Leo

Stephen McConnell wrote:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

bloritsch 2003/03/11 05:29:30

avalon-excalibur/lifecycle/src - New directory

Berin:


This should be under the avalon CVS, not excalibur. It not a utility - it's a couple of interfaces that define extensions to the framework contract.

Cheers, Steve.



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to