Leo Simons wrote:
Hi gang,

going through the paper now, updating code and info. Questions

- anyone mind s/\bComponent\b/component/?

+1


- what is Excalibur Properties utilities? Can I zap the reference?

+1 (was an Excalibur project, then merged into Excalibur Util, and now merged in with projects using it).

- do we want to keep the ComponentHandler information? This is pretty much internal to ECM/Fortress and it is very seldom one actually wants to bind an application to them.

True, but the purpose was to demonstrate how to provide better containers by encapsulating the logic for managing a component into a single class. I would like the spirit of the information to remain.

- do we want to keep pointing peeps at the rolemanager setup and config format or redirect to the newer fortress version, mentioning it still reads the old one?

We should reference the most recent version of Avalon's container.



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to