Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Leo,
Pete definately has a point wrt interceptor architecture (it really
is the "next big thing", except it is become the "current big thing"
fast).
Would you comment on your view of the relative technical merits of the two proposals that are on the table, the interceptor architecture and the lifecycle proposal?
Noel:
Just for reference there is another thread between Jakob Praher and myself in which the we have discussed some of the semantic differences between the notion of interceptors and the notion of lifecycle interfaces.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=104755526600001&r=1&w=2
Cheers, Steve.
--- Noel
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osm.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
