Attributes is a bit quiet. I have a pending request to the list and CC the author about removal of commons-logging (it is only used for 1 warning). I am plucking up courage to make teh commit.
;-))
I'd commit it without remorse. Put yourself in the name of the committers and commit it, it really makes no sense.
Gulp. I lack the karma. That despite putting in a marathon pairing session with James Strachan, Joe Walnes, Charles Lowell, and Mike Royal at TW head office. James committer the patches other than the one Charles and I had done. A neat excercise in TDD and
BTW, I'm still thinking about the logging thing.
Imagine that we have all logging calls done like this:
//@log("hello log");
As a comment? Or a javadoc tag generates into some type of attribute, then conditionally aspected into action. Neat.
I am actually leaning towards no-logging. AltRMI now does not depend on any logger. It has a monitor that can be added, and logging can adapt from that.
we would have logging disabled by default, but we can transform the class to use logging when running, and even transform the log calls to make them compatible with the logging toolkit we want to use.
Not quite sure how, unless I hit it on the head above.
- Paul
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
