On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 05:33, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Peter Donald wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could someone look at this and apply the changes? > > All the BCEL stuff looks complex to say the least, > but code wise it seems ok. > > Do we want to have a compile/runtime dependency on > BCEL if for our users' purpose the Dynamic Proxy > version is OK?
Use DynamicProxy where possible otherwise when we want to support JDK1.2 (like say for Cocoon) we use BCEL. > Hmm. We need to perform some runtime resolution > to see if the BCEL jar is available, and if the > user requests it. yep. > Disposing components is pretty important--esp. > if they save state when they are disposed. Could we > provide that mechanism via a protected or package accessible > method? WOuld that be sufficient? package access. -- Cheers, Peter Donald *----------------------------------------------------------* The phrase "computer literate user" really means the person has been hurt so many times that the scar tissue is thick enough so he no longer feels the pain. -- Alan Cooper, The Inmates are Running the Asylum *----------------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
