On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 02:06, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Peter Donald wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:21, Stephen McConnell wrote: > >>The lifestyle > >>------------- > > > > is in no way is it cross container so should be out of avalon namespace. > > Could we define the attribute name, and allow containers to list the > values it supports? That would require a mapping of standard names > to standard actions. A container would specify that it only supports > a standard set or superset.
Where is the advantage in doing this? If the attribute is not cross-container why put it in generic namespace?? Why not put it in fortress.* namespace until such a time when it is well tested and has time to mature? -- Cheers, Peter Donald ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | I thought there was a knob on the TV to turn up the intelligence. | | There's a knob called "brightness", but it doesn't work. | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
