On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 09:06, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Peter Donald wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:56, Berin Loritsch wrote: > >>Fortress uses some tags in a non-standard way, and it adds one that is > >>not in existence. Peter objects to poluting the Avalon namespace--I > >>agree on differing contracts for @avalon.component and @avalon.service; > > > > Can you describe what you mean by @avalon.service? > > A marker tag for the service work interface (as is current).
I have said several times that this conflicts with the terminology that already exists and suggested that @avalon.role is better for marking role interfaces. Do you have an objection to this? > I > believe that in Pheonix, it is an external reference to the same > thing. nope it is a declaration of support for a service. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -------------------------------- These aren't the droids you're looking for. Move along. -------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
