Steve: Thanks for the reply.
Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 24/06/2003 09:45:48 Please respond to "Avalon Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Avalon Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: Fortress : Positioning within Avalon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see your issue - IMHO excalibur content should not have any container dependencies. Steve. <REPLY> I suppose the another point that I was trying to make is that Avalon should only contain the interfaces and contracts for the framework and any implementations of those interfaces (whether by Avalon Containers or Avalon Components) should exist in another project to reduce the dependencies. While the ANT/GUMP/MAVEN build can generate jar files that minimize/eliminate run-time dependencies, the projects as they stand do have dependencies so far as developers are concerned. But your point about excalibur and its container dependencies is valid and could require the dependencies are refactored out. Presumably this is why Phoenix and Merlin are separate from Excalibur. <REPLY> **************************************************************** NOTICE - This message is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action based upon it. If you received this message in error please notify HIC immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of HIC. **************************************************************** --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
