On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 21:19, Stephen McConnell wrote: > > I think its achievable. > > In fact Aaron's appliance extension provides a good entry point for > plugging in of a JMX extension without having to sub-class > DefaultAppliance. This deals with the component side of things - but we > will need something closer to appliance itself something like an > ApplianceListener and ApplianceEvent which get registered during the > appliance initialization phase. This would address the need for > registration of the appliance as a managable entity before deployment of > components.
ApplianceEvent and ApplianceListener, eh? So when would events be fired? On deployment? On access? I agree that some way of registering appliances would be a nice feature. > Ummm, thinking, thinking ... Me too. :P -- jaaron <http://jadetower.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
