> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [VOTE] > > Place the extension tags (.extension and .stage) in the > @lifecycle namespace. > > [X] +1 I like the proposal > [ ] -1 I am fine with them in the @avalon namespace > [ ] 0 I don't really care (I'll go with the majority) +1
Motivation: Like Berin stated, stages are likely to be superceded in the near-to-mid future by interceptors (or something similar). XP and "we can change it later" is all good stuff - as is most/all what the Dutch Leo writes - but I think the cruft potential here is too strong to allow me to say "we'll change it later" and vote for the avalon namespace. We can always revisit this and move them into the avalon namespace at a later time, if my intuition proves wrong. That will also be easier than to move something *out* of avalon namespace, and I guess I'll use the XP excuse here... /LS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
