> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [AvalonStart] > public void comenzar() throws Exception {} > > Or instead of Configurable.configure(), a developer can > declare it like > this: > > [AvalonConfigure] > public void configuracion( Configuration config ) throws > ConfigurationException {} I don't like this.
It makes the contract much more loose and the method names turn into a mess. Right now, if I see a method named "configure" then I know where it fits in. Maybe I'm just an old fart, but all this new-fangled attributes & reflection stuff seems a bit overflexible. Like C++, make things flexible but not mutable - I think this is on the mutable side. /LS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
