Berin Loritsch wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Berin Loritsch wrote:
Essentially, I want to point potential Apache projects that want access
to Avalon-Components to ask the PMC, and as we have for Cocoon and JAMES
we vote on it. Nothing stating that we need to have the results of a
project vote or any other such formalism.
For example, if FOP wanted access to Excalibur or Components, they probably
wouldn't even know that the option exists. By putting a pointer to have
Apache projects request the Avalon PMC for access on the web site, the
information is out there.
OK - this confirms that the seocond half of your vote is not actually a valid motion. Could you post a confirmation of this so that we don't get confussed over any vote result arrising from this thread?
<shudder subject="not actually a valid motion" type="I'll get over it."/>
ROTFL
I officially confirm that the PMC does not have to vote on the issue of adding the page to the site.
Thanks - I appreciate this.
Stephen.
--
Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osm.net
Sent via James running under Merlin as an NT service. http://avalon.apache.org/sandbox/merlin
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
