Serge Knystautas wrote: > Kenny Smith wrote: > I actually have to agree with Anders
So do I, and so do the Avalon developers, who are already looking at it and talking about it. However, they did not CC our list on their discussion, so none of you are aware of it. See the thread: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] &by=thread&from=478787 If they can get the fixes into the Avalon update(s), then we can refresh our release with all of the new release code that they've worked on this year. > Yeah, same here. Avalon configuration is to James as m4 is to > sendmail... just a completely ridiculous, unfriendly way to > configure a mail server. Well, I find James much easier to configure then sendmail. That is one of the reason's I got involved with James in the first place. However, I agree that it could be easier. I suggest that folks take a look at the GUI configurator that Robert Cadena wrote earlier. It is at http://www.machine501.com/projects/JamesConfigTool/index.html. Perhaps one or more people would like to get involved in developing the code, which is under the Apache license. Actually, if we had enough people with an interest, it could become a James and/or generic Avalon configuration GUI project, either here or in Avalon. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
