* Berin Loritsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
I just got done talking to some microsoft representatives today (a technology
evangelist and an enterprise architect). They are by no means authorities on
all business matters of Microsoft, but I was able to get a few insights. As
regarding our new efforts (in Avalon) into code that works with .NET we need to
look into some background and some precedures to satisfy our needs.
You seem to entirely ignoring mono in this email. Is there a reason why? http://www.go-mono.net/ ; http://www.go-mono.net/faq.html#licensing (esp in regard to the class libraries being MIT/X11 licensed, which I believe should be totally compatible with our licenses) Regards, -Thom
No reason why, other than I don't know what they have done and have not done. If there are things that the Mono team has implemented that will be patened in the near future, where does that put us?
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
