I don't think there is anything to fix.
IMVHO,
we should have the framework link on the LHS and TRS direct immediately to
/framework
and the content on that page should be updated to include a link to
/meta
Leading to the following observation:
framework = "core utilities" + "lifecycle contracts" +
"meta"However, "meta" came late to the party, hence is seperate, hence there will be some ambiguity (unless someone goes through the trouble of convincing everyone that meta should be avalon-framework-meta.jar). Hence the "platform" idea.
We now have the worst of all worlds. In essence, the current view is that
meta *is part of* framework
where we make this distinction:
framework product = framework distribution + meta distribution
where the "product" and "distribution" are not tacked on for brevity, leading to a view for the casual user of
framework = framework + meta
which can be abbreviated to
framework += meta
which is not the clearest of organisational structure. But then, I didn't care enough at first to mention it :D
cheers,
- LSD
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
