Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Item 9, I am a little bit split over myself. Sometimes I feel that theIt depends on the type of management we are exposing I suppose. One of the
container should be able to provide a Management Interface automatically,
but how would it know what is part of management, and what is part of the
components normal function. TBD.
thoughts on this was the JMX integration with Phoenix. The container used
metadata to construct the JMX interface, and the proxy to manage the
component in question.
You are probably right. But does Merlin have such support?
Partially - the kernel is JMX controllable and Appliance also but not exposed yet. More work needed on a container listener before this is completed.
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
